Dvar Torah on Parshat Naso

This week's parsha, Naso, continues to discuss the arrangements for the trek the Jewish nation is about to make through the desert to the Land of Israel. The Levites, who are responsible for transporting the Tabernacle, are counted, and their work load is apportioned among them. This is followed by a number of laws concerning ritual purity, aimed at keeping the camp pure, a number of other laws which I will not discuss, and then, towards the end of the parsha, after everything seems to have been arranged and the nation should be ready to start to make its way to the promised land, with the Tabernacle in place at the center of the camp and all the tribes arranged appropriately around it, the nesi'im, the leaders of the twelve tribes, suddenly approach Moshe. They bring him a gift - "six covered wagons and twelve cattle, a wagon from every two leaders and an ox from each one, and they brought them near to the Tabernacle." Moshe is unsure what to do with this voluntary gift, until God tells him: "Take these from them, that they may be for the work of the Tent of Meeting, and give them to the Levites, each man according to his work-load." Moshe then apportioned the wagons and oxen among the Levites, according to the amount of material from the Tabernacle that they had to transport.

This voluntary, spontaneous gift from the heads of the tribes to the Levites contains many interesting messages. First of all, we have the theme of the Torah's leaving room for input from the people. After dozens, no, hundreds, of verses relating to the way the Tabernacle should be designed, constructed and transported, there was still room left for improvement - still room for a new, innovative way to make the work of transporting the parts of the Tabernacle easier and more efficient.

This is not the only occasion on which room is left for suggestions, improvements, or challenges to the orders of the Torah. In fact, Rashi points out that the nesi'im themselves had, before our story about their donations, also left space for the Jewish people, the people they were leading, in which to act. All through the process of donating materials for the Tabernacle - the silver, gold, fabrics, and other materials needed - the nesi'im are not mentioned. This is because they did not, as nesi'im, bring any specific donations. Instead, they held back, leaving room for the people to act first and bring what they could, thinking that they, the leaders, would later fill in whatever was missing. But they were surprised at the people's generous response; at the end of the process there was almost nothing left for them to donate. This, according to Rashi, is the reason why they hurried to bring the gifts of the wagons and oxen; to fill a gap which they perceived, before one of the people did. The nesi'im felt that they should allow the people to take the central role in the building of the mishkan - a wonderful leadership style -  and now, after that worked so surprisingly well, they sought the opportunity to bring at least something of their own for the Tabernacle.

This model of leadership, wherein those in charge leave room for their followers to act, and see themselves as being there only to do whatever is left undone, is a fascinating one. I have often thought about parenting in this way - the challenge is to leave space for your kids to do the right thing on their own. A former teacher of mine, Rabbi Jay Miller, once said that, just as in the Ari's (16th century Zfat) Kabbalistic model of the creation of the world, wherein God has to do an act of tzimtzum - shrinking, contracting - in order to make room for something other than himself to exist - that something being the created universe - parents, too, must do an act of tzimtzum in order to leave space for their children to function and grow. The difficulty that the nesi'im had with this, when they saw that their 'children', the people of Israel, had gone ahead and done just about everything for themselves, leaving hem to scramble to try and find some area where thy could make a contribution, is interesting and beautiful.

There is also here an important lesson about egalitarianism, and brotherhood. The Levites are assisted in their role in the Tabernacle by the rest of the people; the nesi'im, representing their tribes, act sensitively, and in harmony, to make the Levites' work easier. In this way, the entire nation has an ongoing stake in the day-to-day functioning of God's Temple. The S'forno also points out that having every two nesi'im jointly give one wagon is another sign of cooperation and brotherhood.

After the giving of the wagons and oxen, the nesi'im AGAIN approach Moshe, with yet ANOTHER voluntary gift. Each one of the twelve nesi'im brings a series of animal and grain sacrifices to be offered on the altar, along with vessels which they donate to the Tabernacle. Once again, Moshe is nonplussed by this uncalled-for gift, until God gives him the go-ahead, and orders each one of the nesi'im to bring his sacrifice separately, one day at a time. What is the purpose of this second round of unbidden gifts? What need do they serve, what hitherto un-thought of role do they play? Rashi has a beautiful explanation: "After they offered the wagons and cattle used to transport the Tabernacle, their hearts moved them to volunteer these sacrifices to dedicate the altar." The language Rashi uses is highly suggestive. If their first batch of giving - the wagons and the oxen - was essentially a response to a real need that the Levites had, this second round is an answer to an inner need on the part of the nesi'im to give, and to celebrate. The nesi'im inspired themselves: they were moved by their unselfish, creative, sensitive and brotherly act of giving to give more. Moshe was at first unsure of how to respond to this - after all, this dedicatory round of offerings had not been asked for by God. God's advice to him - let them bring the sacrifices, one day at a time - seems to not only accept the spontaneous gift of each nasi, but to individualize it. God's decision to give each nasi a separate day in which to bring his sacrifice seems to underscore the individuality of each gift. This, in spite of the fact that they all gave the exact same thing.

The Torah, in fact, at the very end of our parsha, goes through the same list, twelve times, of animals and incense and grain offering and utensils that each one of the leaders brought. This seemingly unnecessary repetition of the same list of offerings creates, I think a balance. A balance between the individual expression of each nasi's desire to give of himself to the Tabernacle - underscored by each nasi getting his own day and his own separate mention - and the collective nature of their act - they all originally approached Moshe together and they all give the exact same thing. This balance between the individual and the collective, between the urge to stand out from and the urge to be a part of, is a balance that all of us must struggle to achieve in our personal and communal lives.

Shabbat Shalom,

Rabbi Shimon Felix